Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Let's test the TCP/IP stack on the i.MX RT1050RT10XX.

From the development host validate that the i.MX RT1050 target is visible using ping:

Code Block
$ ping -c 5 192.168.1.86
PING 192.168.1.86 (192.168.1.86) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 192.168.1.86: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=20.7 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.86: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=5.72 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.86: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=5.84 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.86: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=5.72 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.86: icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=6.30 ms

--- 192.168.1.86 ping statistics ---
5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4005ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 5.715/8.851/20.692/5.924 ms

ping the development host from the i.MX RT1050target:

Code Block
/ # ping -c 5 192.168.1.89
PING 192.168.1.89 (192.168.1.89): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 192.168.1.89: seq=0 ttl=64 time=4.916 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.89: seq=1 ttl=64 time=5.071 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.89: seq=2 ttl=64 time=5.286 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.89: seq=3 ttl=64 time=5.226 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.89: seq=4 ttl=64 time=5.595 ms

--- 192.168.1.89 ping statistics ---
5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 4.916/5.218/5.595 ms

...